Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> February 13, 1995 <br /> Page 8 <br /> parcel size to establish a residence or a farm operation is 35 <br /> acres, subject to certain exceptions not here applicable. <br /> Section 10. 125 (1) (a) of the Dane County Ordinances states <br /> the purposes of A-1 Agriculture District (Exclusive) . Two of the <br /> purposes are to preserve productive agricultural land and <br /> productive farms. Another is to comply with the provisions of the <br /> Farmland Preservation Law to permit eligible landowners to receive <br /> tax credits under Section 71.09 (11) of the Wisconsin Statutes. <br /> Section 10. 123 (1) (b) of the Ordinances states that an exclusive <br /> agricultural zoning district is intended to apply to lands in <br /> productive farm operations. Under Section 10.123 (5) of the <br /> Ordinances the minimum lot size to establish or maintain a farm <br /> operation is 35 acres . <br /> Prior to the effective date of A-1 Exclusive Agriculture <br /> zoning blanket coverage, this parcel did not conform to the 35-acre <br /> minimum size standards and was not suitable for farming. This <br /> parcel was and is not eligible or suitable for farmland <br /> preservation and tax credits under the applicable statutes and <br /> ordinances. This parcel was and is not suitable for the uses to <br /> which the Dane County Ordinances restrict it. Notwithstanding, <br /> this parcel was covered by A-1 Exclusive Agriculture zoning applied <br /> in blanket fashion. We believe this parcel properly should have <br /> been excluded from the blanket A-1 Exclusive Agriculture zoning <br /> coverage and should have been rezoned to allow rural development. <br /> If this parcel should have been excluded from A-1 Exclusive <br /> Agriculture zoning coverage, it follows that land use policies and <br /> standards applicable to farmland preservation are inappropriate and <br /> irrelevant to rezoning this parcel . Applying farmland preservation <br /> policies and standards to this parcel perpetuates rather than <br /> corrects a zoning classification error. The result obtained from <br /> applying land use policies and standards applicable to farmland <br /> preservation to a parcel which is substandard and unsuitable for <br /> farming are unfair, harsh, and clearly not intended by statutes and <br /> ordinances. <br /> (3) The Proposed Rural Development Is Consistent With <br /> Agricultural Use And Will Not Interfere With Surrounding Uses. <br /> Agriculture is not just farming. Agriculture is a broad <br /> range of fields that go beyond traditional farming. It <br /> encompasses, among other things, agriculture-related business in <br /> biotechnology, environmental and landscape management and <br /> horticulture. The proposed rezoning is consistent with <br /> agricultural use in that: <br /> (a) the proposed uses will not conflict with farming on <br /> site or convert any land suitable for farming; <br />