|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-05990
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
DCPREZ-0000-05990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 12:10:31 PM
Creation date
3/15/2016 12:04:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
05990
Town
Windsor Township
Section Numbers
15
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-05990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> agricultural benefits from the land. Does the Board wish to preserve all agricultural land,or just <br /> some? <br /> 10. Zoning and Land Use(planning report). It would seem that this rezoning is being presented <br /> as a chill lenge to the Board's policy of agriculture preservation. In all aspects,the Schlitzs'land is <br /> a mini-farm. The land consists of ten acres,two white barns,and a green pole barn. The land can <br /> remain agricultural and still be used for raising animals. The Board cannot permit a rezoning to <br /> occur simply because they are impressed by the owner's plans. They should consider the people <br /> who must live with the business. <br /> 11. Our Property Being an Asset to the Schlitz's. At the Plan Committee meeting,John Schlitz <br /> was tot ling the board how valuable our land was to him:that if we wanted to sell,they would <br /> purchase it from us. That way"we would be protected". On 6/26/94 we informed Mr. Schlitz that <br /> he could purchase the property immediately for the fair market value. He was told we wanted to <br /> sell before the kennel was installed. He did not appear interested in the offer. He showed no <br /> enthusiasm,and had no comment. It would appear Mr. Schlitz is misrepresenting his true attitude <br /> towards our property,and attempting to instill in us a false sense of security. <br /> 12. Horses Same as Dogs? At the Plan Committee meeting the Board members concluded that <br /> there is no difference between the boarding of horses and the boarding of dogs. If this is true,then <br /> it can be reasoned rezoning is not necessary. Horses are legal farm animals,and if there is no <br /> difference between the needs of horses and those of dogs,then dogs should be considered farm <br /> animals as well. Why,then,is this on the agenda? We would much prefer forty horses over forty <br /> dogs. <br /> We bear no malice against the Schlitz family. We invite all involved to come and walk our <br /> property, and to talk to us. If the Board members can honestly say that they would buy this house <br /> (at the fair market value of 200,000)and live less than 300 feet away from over forty barking <br /> dogs,then so be it. If the Board members cannot,then how can they expect anyone else to? <br /> We maintain an open door policy on drop-in guests,and we ask you all to take advantage of it. <br /> Stop in at any time between now and July 12th and see first hand our situation. We would <br /> appreciate your presence and exchange of thoughts. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> r) , <br /> Roger and LuAnn Coffey. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.