DCPREZ-0000-06080 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OCT 2 01994 ►7ANE COUNTY LAND REG. &RECORDS 8/31/94 I applied and paid for the application (Petition No. 6080) for re-zoning of the property to R-1 Residential and RH-1 Rural Homes to the Dane County Board of Supervisors at Madison, Wisconsin. Property description: NE 1/4 SW 1/4 of Section 26 in the Town of Dunn at 1939 Lake Kegonsa Rd. I provided all the requirements for the Dept. of Zoning. The Town of Dunn has denied. I was told at the City County Building when I applied for this petition, that the re-zoning I requested would be allowed without any question. I have since contacted Jim Knowles of the U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers at Waukesha, Wisconsin and presented him with the issue at hand. I was told per telephone conversation that the State can amend the petition and allow the permit to build on the .69 acre parcel. I have also since then contacted Mr. Bill Heck, Supervisor of Dane County Land Regulation & Records and discussed the problem I have encountered with the Town of Dunn in my quest for re-zoning. He expressed a concern of my plight and stated that there should be no problem with granting my request for re-zoning. 3/22/82 Letter from the Dept. of Transportation states "The restricted development area is .98 acre. Your property remaining south and west of the new highway will be allowed one driveway to the new highway." To this day, there is no driveway on that section. 9/20/82 Regarding the Appraisal Report from Larry E. Lichte, the present use was "Non-conforming Commercial Use". The State acquired 1.55 acres and .98 acre in Restricted Development Easement and .16 acre Existing Road. The highest and best use at the time of the report was "Non-conforming Use continuance or Single Family Residential". "The appraiser had considered the lack of sewer at the present time, however a relatively new system has been installed immediately to the North of the subject property which services a large restaurant and it is therefore reasonable and prudent to expect that such a facility (or at its worst a holding tank) could be installed at this five acre site to facilitate a commercial or residential user." "It is this appraisers opinion that the division of this property thru the proposed acquisition will so restrict the use and accessibility, and therefore its value and salability, that the owner will be left with an uneconomic remnant, and that the Condemnor should therefore acquire the uneconomic remnant along with the property being taken. This would appear to be in the interest of justice to the subject property." The Fair Market Value of the property at the time was $16,000.00 plus $5,000.00 for the building, or a total by the Cost of Approach of$21,000.00. The appraiser sited several other properties in the area that were allowed to build with values around $7,000 per acre or Commercial lots with municipal services for sites of approximately 1/2 acre would sell for between $20,000 and 530.000 and if municipal services are not available, the selling price is less. The appraisal report stated "Since the parcel may also he used as a single family residential site..." I had requested the State to purchase my entire 5 acre parcel site which they refused and denied.