Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> Page 4 <br /> Bowman Appeal <br /> Whether s. 10.28 requires that appelant's parcel must be rezoned on a theory of <br /> inconsistency. <br /> This section, 10.28, of the Dane County Zoning Ordinance is intended to provide <br /> consistency only to the narrative portions of this ordinance as well as other county <br /> ordinances. Section 10.28 is not intended to operate to avoid rezoning by ordinance for a <br /> particular parcel; this is a legislative matter not an administrative one. This provision by no <br /> means is intended to be utilized for the repealing of zoning districts or the zoning <br /> classification on a given parcel and applies only to previously adopted actions. <br /> Appelants agrue that their parcel does not meet the descriptive (but non binding) <br /> language of 10.123(1)(a) statement of purpose. Whether a parcel matches well, <br /> adequately, or poorly is not an administrative determination. It is not for a Zoning <br /> Administrator to say that 28 acres can't be used for tree production or some other use. <br /> It is not administratively appropriate to in effect rezone the property when legislative <br /> action has been taken. <br /> Whether s. 10.123(9)(b) is intended to designate substandard parcels as R-1. <br /> The provisions of section 10.123(9)(b) of the Dane County Zoning Ordinance addresses <br /> substandard parcels as well as residential building on substandard parcels. Based upon this <br /> provision and the provisions referenced in sections 10.12(5)(b) and 10.05(4), it indicates <br /> that Mr. Bowman's parcel is complying with applicable provisions of the ordinance and is <br /> shown not to be in conflict with Chapter 10. Section 10.123(9)(b) specifically provides <br /> for this situation by permitting the A-1 Ex parcel of substandard size (less than 35 acres) <br />