Laserfiche WebLink
. . . <br /> G� , 14. , Said petition was vetoed by Defendant Phelps on December 14, 1993. 1 Notice of <br /> i <br /> veto and veto message was received by Defendant Dane County Board of Supervisors on or about <br /> December 14, 1993 and is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by reference. <br /> /� 15. On January 19, 1993, Defendant Dane County Board of Supervisors attempted to <br /> over-ride said veto, but failed by a 23-9 vote. <br /> 16. Defendant Phelps' exercise of his veto herein violated Article IV, Section 23 of the <br /> Wisconsin Constitution because it was exercised without adopted administrative standards and as <br /> such constitutes unfettered discretion and is unconstitutional as violating the Plaintiffs' guaranteed <br /> rights to equal protection and due process and is also otherwise contrary to Wisconsin law. <br /> II. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION <br /> VETO ACTION WAS BASED UPON ERRORS OF LAW <br /> 17. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1-16 above. <br /> ,,1-8-- The objections (Exhibit 2) which provided the basis and reasons for the Defendant <br /> / <br /> Phelps' veto were based upon errors of law in that the rezoning petition was neither violative of <br /> any Springdale town plan nor of any Dane County Comprehensive Plan; also reliance upon the <br /> Village of Mount Horeb's comprehensive Plan in it's extraterritorial area to veto an amendment to <br /> the County's Zoning Ordinance also constitutes an error of law. <br /> III. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION <br /> VETO ACTION WAS ARBITRARY AND DISCRIMINATORY <br /> 19. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1-18 above. <br /> 4 <br />