1971 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE DANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING OF MAY 21, 1971 The Dane County Board of Adjustment met on May 21, 1971 at 7:30 P. M. in Room 226 (Circuit Court Branch IV), to conduct a Public Hearing as published in the notice. Present: Erickson, Holte, Dahlk, Also: Enger, Fleck. Meeting was called to order, minutes of April 23 and May 15, 1971 were approved. Notice was read and the Public Hearing was opened. V #118. Appeal by C. Cox from denial of a permit to build an addition to a residence on a parcel of land located in the SW-1' NWT of Section 10, Township of Albion. Permit denied because rear yard is less than required by the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. IN FAVOR: Mr. Cox presented drawing, needs variance to finish building ad_iition. OTHERS IN FAVOR: none. OPPOSED: none. #119. Appeal by R. Sorenson from denial of a permit to build an addition to a residence on a parcel of land located in the rd.3.1= NE4 of Section 29, Township of Pleasant Springs. Permit denied because rear yard is less than required by the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. IN FAVOR: Mr. Sorenson stated other houses in area have same problem, some have existing porches which are too close to the rear line. OTHERS IN FAVOR: none. OPPOSED: none. TOWN BOARD: Chairman, David Manson, telephoned Zoning Department stating the Town Board has no objection to the appeal. v #120. Appeal by H. Spahn from denial of a permit to build a hay barn on a parcel of land located in the NE NWT of Section 31, Township of Springfield. Permit denied because setback from road is less than required by the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. IN FAVOR: Mr. Spahn presented drawing, stated that this is the only location he can build because of existing buildings and cow yard. If road were to be straightened in the future, would be willing to provide right of way on the opposite side. OTHERS IN FAVOR: none, OPPOSED: none. TOWN BOARD: John Laufenberg, Supervisor, stated that the Town Board had viewed the property. If the road were to be changed it would be moved further away from proposed barn. Board in favor of granting the appeal, ✓ #122. Appeal by R. Aton for a Speoial Exception Permit to build in the flood plain and also a variance in rear yard requirements, to permit construction of an addition to a residence located on a parcel of land in the SEX_ SE 1/4 of Section 22, Township of Mazomanie, IN FAVOR: R. Aton,left details to contractor, was unaware of rear yard requirements,or of the flood plain ordinance. OTHERS IN FAVOR: M. Walter, Supervisor District #47, presented drawing which showed that the property in question was approximately 6" below the road.At this point the road is not in the flood plain. Walter expressed concern over causing property owners to prove they are not within the flood plain area. River to date has not flooded this area and based on this and the possible error of the flood plain line, the appeal should be granted. A letter from Lee Pagel, property owner to the rear, was presented