1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ZONING MINUTES - Page 2 _ Pd. of Adjustment #517. Appeal by Richard Evanson for a variance from required setback form the centerline of STH 78 as provided by Section 10.17 (1) Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit construction of a residence in part of the NW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 25, Town of Vermont. IN FAVOR: R. Evanson - OPPOSED: None - TOWN BOARD: Not present. #518. Appeal by Elwood Johnson for a variance from required setback from the centerline of STH 134 as provided by Section 10.17 (1) Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit an a addition to a residence located in part of the SE1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 36, Town Deerfield. IN FAVOR: E. Johnson - OPPOSED: None - TOWN BOARD: Not present. #519. Appeal by Edward C. Mock for a variance from required setback from the centerline of Lake Road (C.T.H. CV) as provided by Section 10.17 (2) Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit construction of a residence in part of the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 31, Town of Windsor. IN FAVOR: E. Mock - OPPOSED: None - TOWN BOARD: No position. LETTER: Dane County Highway - objection. #520. Appeal by the Dane County Farm Drainage Board for a Special Exception Permit to remove silt, debris, brush and trees from Koshkonong Creek in Sections 8 and 18, Town of Sun Prairie. Permit is required by Section 10.16 (7) (g) Dane County Zoning Ordinance. IN FAVOR: G. Skaar Chairman Dane County Drainage District #9. IN FAVOR: Lawrence Maly - OPPOSED: None - TOWN BOARD: Not present. DNR - No communication. The public hearing was closed. #511. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to hold in abeyance. Motion carried. #512. Motion by Dahlk second by Voges to grant 28 foot variance from required setback from center of Krause Road as per finding of fact. 1. Foundation is existing. 2. New roof and interior will not make it more non-conforming 3. Structure does not constitute a traffic hazzard as road is straight. CONCLUSION: A. Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. B. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. C. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. 4E;