1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Page 3 • lir) #476. Appeal by Alvin Lokken for a variance from required lot width and area for an agricultural use, as provided by Section 10.12 (4) (a) of the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit the keeping of cattle on this property• located in part of the SE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 20, Town of Middleton. In Favor: Alvin Lokken - Opposed: L. J. Enger, Zoning Administrator - Town Board: not present. #477. Appeal by Jackson Logan for a variance from required setback on S.T.H. 19 as provided by Section 10.17 (1) of the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary for repairs/restoration of a residence located in part of the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 9, Town of Medina. In Favor: Jackson Logan - Opposed: None - Town Board: Telephone call, Chairman Leo Benesch, no objection. #478. Appeal by William Roberts for a variance from requirement that an accessory building as provided by Section 10.01 (1) and (2) of the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit a horse barn on a parcel of land located in part of the SW 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 5, Town of Cottage Grove. In Favor: William Roberts - Opposed: None - Town Board: Telephone call, Gene Skaar, Chairman, no objection. #479. Appeal by The Dane County Park Commission for a Special Exception Permit to place a structure on the bed of the Yahara River as provided by Section 10.16 (7) (g) and Section 10.33 (3) of the Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Permit is necessary to allow construction of a con- crete boat launch ramp in part of the NE 1/4 SW 1/4 of Section 13, Town of Dunn. In Favor: R. Presny, Park Director - Opposed: none — Town Board: letter, in favor. Public hearing closed. #464. Motion by Dahlk second by Voges to grant 3 foot variance from rear yard requirement as per finding of fact. 1. location was determined by compliance with fire wall, building code. 2. no adjacent residence - only open farm fields. CONCLUSION: a. variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible with- out injustice to applicant. b. variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried.