Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> Minutes of Board Adjustment 6/20/75 <br /> Motion by Dahik, second by Voges to grant 2' variance from rear yard <br /> requirement as per finding of fact. <br /> 1. Violation was created by negligence of contractor. <br /> 2. Residence is finished and occupied. <br /> 3. Other yards meet ordinance requirements. <br /> Conclusion: A. Violation was not intentional by owner <br /> B. Variance is not contrary to public interest or rights <br /> of others. <br /> Notion carried. <br /> #353. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to grant 61' variance from road <br /> setback as pm finding of fact. <br /> 1. Existing building is non-conforming. <br /> 2. Addition will not encroach farther into setback. <br /> Conclusion: A. Case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> B. Not contrary to public interest or rights of others. <br /> C. Variance is necessary to provide rights enjoyed <br /> by others. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #351 . Notion by Dahlk second by Voges to grant a Special Exception <br /> Permit to build an accessory building subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. Building is to be of masonry construction. <br /> 2. Electrical service, outlets, etc. are to be installed above the <br /> flood protection elevation. <br /> 3. No sanitary facilites; toilet, sink or drain, are to be installed. <br /> Notion carried. <br /> #355. Notion by Voges second by Dahlk to grant a Special Exception Permit <br /> to build an accessory building subject to -the following conditions: <br /> 1, The Building shall be firmly anchored to the foundation. <br /> 2. Heating or electrical service are to be installed above the flood <br /> protection elevation. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #356. Notion by Dahlk, second by Voges to approve a variance of 35' <br /> from rear yard requirement as per finding of fact. <br /> 1. Existing residence is non-conforming <br /> 2. Setback from road, and both side yards need requirements. <br /> Conclusion: A. Case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> B. Variance required to provide right enjoyed by others <br /> C. Not contrary to public interest or rights of others <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #357. Notion by Voges, second by Dahlk to grant a variance of 20' <br /> from required setback from road as per find of fact: <br /> 1. Existing building is non-conforming. <br /> 2. Addition will be on the rear. <br /> 3. Side and rear yard requirements will be met. <br /> Conclusion: ACase of unnecessary hardship. <br /> B. Variance required to provide right enjoyed by others <br /> C. Not contrary to public interest or rights of others. <br /> ,. ' Notion carried. <br />