Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE DANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> MEETING OF MAY 9, 1974 <br /> Present: Erickson and Dahlk. Also: Hesslink <br /> Meeting called to order in executive session at 1:30 P. M. by <br /> Chairman Erickson in Room 313D of the City-County Building. <br /> Board noted that notice of Executive Session had been posted in <br /> the Office of the County Clerk and Zoning Department. <br /> A. Board discussed the evidence and legal problems relating to <br /> Appeal *276 (Melvin Cohen) with Mr. Hesslink. The Board finds <br /> the following facts: <br /> 1. Appellant 's property is currently zoned A-1 Agricultural; <br /> 2. Appellant is currently in the business of retail sales of <br /> groceries and related items, which activity is not engaged in <br /> on the premises in question; <br /> 3. Appellant is also in the business of shipping by truck <br /> produce and related food items both for his own retail stores <br /> and other outlets in various parts of Wisconsin. That in the <br /> natural course of this shipping business, the appellant often <br /> parks semitrailers and semitractors on the property which is <br /> the subject of this appeal. The said tractors and trailers <br /> are out in the open and that there are no docks or storage <br /> facilities on or about the property; and <br /> 4. That the Zoning Administrator has ruled that this use of <br /> the appellant 's property constitutes a "truck terminal" <br /> within the meaning of the Ordinance and is in violation of <br /> the Zoning Ordinance limitation of private garages. <br /> The Board concludes as a matter of law, based on the above facts: <br /> 1 . That the appellant 's use of his property does not violate <br /> the Zoning Ordinance limitation of private garages; and <br /> 2. That the appellant 's use of his land constitutes a "truck <br /> terminal" within the meaning of the Dane County Zoning Ordinance <br /> and is, therefore, not a permitted use in an A-i Agricultural <br /> District. <br /> Mr. Dahlk moved that the decision of the Zoning Administrator be <br /> upheld, but only insofar as it held that the appellant 's use of his <br /> property constitutes a "truck terminal. " Mr. Erickson seconded the <br /> motion. The motion carried. <br />