1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Le we do not say that we do. However, we do have the power to interpret the Ordinance and to decide whether the Ordinance allows prisons as a conditional use in the A-1 Exclusive Agricultural District. As its final ground for its Motion to Dismiss , the State argues that Attorney Myron Cherry is not licensed to practice law in the State of Wisconsin. We believe that this Board lacks the authority to decide whether or not Mr. Cherry's status in any way prevents him from appearing before this Board. The regulation of the practice of law is not one of the powers of this Board and we decline to act. In addition, we would like to point out that it is a common practice before this Board for principals to be represented by agents of whom very few are lawyers. We believe that there are other avenues available to the State if it wishes to prohibit nonlawyers from appearing before this Board. Ilikw The principle issue before this Board still remains . We perceive the issue to turn on the question of whether or not the term "governmental use" as it appears in Section 10. 12 (4) (b) , Dane County Ordinances , includes prisons . Section 10. 12 (4) , Dane County Ordinances, lists a multitude of conditional uses in the A-1 Exclusive Agricultural District. Prisons are not specifically listed as conditional uses. However, prisons are specifically listed as conditional uses in the A-1 Agricultural District, Section 10. 12 (2) (o) , Dane County Ordinances (the non- iExclusive Agricultural District) . Section 10. 16 (1) (a) , Dane County Ordinances , 1 provides that a use which is permitted in one district is prohibited in all other districts unless specifically listed in any such other district. That Section e clearly applies here. Prisons are specifically listed in the A-1 Agricultural District but nowhere else. Therefore, the only place prisons are permitted is in 1 the A-1 Agricultural District. They are not permissible in the A-1 Exclusive Agricultural District. 9 iAttorneys for the State and for St. Joseph 's Seminary have raised the argument that the term "government uses" is so broad or imprecise that the Cohen rule should be applied and the Board should conclude that prisons are a conditional use within the A-Agricultural District. We decline to do so on the ground that the clear application of the exclusionary rule of Section 10. 16 (1) (a) , Dane County Ordinances, eliminates the need to refer to the Cohen rule which requires ambiguities to be resolved in favor of the free use of land. In our opinion, the Zoning Ordinance should be interpreted by reference to internal standards if at all possible and that resort to other methods of statutory construction ought to be avoided if at all possible. The internal standard here is clear and yields a clear result.