Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Minutes <br /> November 15, 1979 <br /> Page 2 <br /> (Pr <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Proposed construction will be farther from the road than the <br /> existing house which is to be removed and the existing barn. <br /> 2. Moving construction farther from road will place it in low <br /> area with high water table. Low land actually surrounds the <br /> farm yard complex and prevents construction other than proposed. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #845. Motion by Purcell, second by Kruschke to grant a variance of 1 <br /> foot from required setback. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Setback error was caused by misinterpretation of site plan. <br /> Foundation location did not take into consideration the canti- <br /> levered first floor. <br /> 2. Other residences in the area are as close or closer to High Road. <br /> 3. Embankment of property to the South extends closer to the road <br /> than this house. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> (10, c. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #846. Motion by Schwahn, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 51 <br /> feet 5 inches, for the mare barn, and 89 feet 3 inches, for the arena <br /> building, from the required distance such buildings must be located <br /> from a residene district property line. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Buildings were constructed by former owner of the property. <br /> 2. Buildings were constructed before most of the residences in the <br /> residential area. No complaints on use have been recieved. <br /> 3. Moving of buildings is not feasible because of cement foundation <br /> and built-in barn cleaners, etc. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> c. Hardship is caused by the Ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #806. Motion by Voges, second by Schwahn to rescind board action of <br /> July 26, 1979. Motion carried. Motion by Voges, second by Purcell to <br /> grant a variance of 114 square feet, for Lot #1 and 161 square feet for <br /> Lot #2, from required lot area. <br /> thily <br />