1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Minutes P.H. May 24, 1979 Page 3 41110* #778. Appeal by William O. Haase for a variance from required setback from front property line as provided by Section 10.17 (5) (b) - Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit a raised en- trance deck to residence on Lot 1, Sauk Woods, 3996 Shawn Trail, Section 21, Middleton. Not present. #779. Appeal by Orin Hermundstad for a variance from required set back from normal high water line as provided by Section 10.16 (7) (d) - Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit a raised deck for a new residence in part of Government Lot #1, NW 1/4 Section 29, Town of Pleasant Springs. IN FAVOR: O. Hermundstad; Mike Clayton, Surveyor, R. Meyer, Architect. OPPOSED: None TOWN BOARD: not present DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RE- SOURCES: No communication. #780. Appeal by Walter A. Brietzman for a variance from required set- back from the normal high waterline as provided by Section 10.16 (7) (d) - Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit an addition to a residence located on Lot #19, Addition to Ole J. Quam Park 3420 Quam Drive, Section 25, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: W. Brietzman OPPOSED: None TOWN BOARD: Telephone call, in favor. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: No communication. #781. Appeal by the Town of Cottage Grove for a variance from required setback from C.T.H. "N" as provided by Section 10.17 (2) (b) - Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit construction of a storage shed in the NW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 16, 4080 C.T.H. "N" , Town of Cottage Grove. Letter from Town Board requesting withdrawal, building can be located without a variance. The public hearing was closed. #767. Motion by Schwahn second by Purcell to deny. FINDING OF FACT: 1. As per Zoning Administrator, most of department cost is in re- view of and issuance of permit, filing, recording, etc. This cost would be transferred to the public if fee was to be re- funded. 2. All ramifications of proposed construction, including mortgage money, building costs, decision to build are the responsibility of the individual intending to build. Costs incurred by a de- cision not to build should not be passed on to the public. CONCLUSION: a. Unnecessary hardship not proven. b. Return of permit fee is not in the public interest. Motion carried.