Laserfiche WebLink
- Minutes ST. a A- 4. <br /> August 19, 1977 <br /> Pg. 6 <br /> 1' <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> c. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public P <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #590. Motion by Dahlk second by Voges to hold in abeyance to provide <br /> time for additional information and decision will be rendered no later <br /> than September 16, 1977, Motion carried. <br /> #591. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to grant a special exception permi' <br /> for construction of ponds as proposed. Motion carried. <br /> #592. Motion by Dahlk second by Voges to grant a 6 foot variance from re <br /> quired side yard and a 45 foot variance from the required setback from <br /> waterline as per finding of fact: <br /> 1. Existing house is too close to water and side line. <br /> 1 2. Addition will not be closer to side line than the existing house. F' <br /> 3. .Any alteration, etc. to river side of house would require a vari- <br /> ance. <br /> conclusion: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> c. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the r <br /> public interest. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #593. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to grant a 13 foot variance from <br /> required setback from water and to amend appeal and grant a 5 foot vari- <br /> ance from required right side yard (north property line) as per finding <br /> of fact: <br /> 1. Addition will fill in corner of house and not extend beyond the <br /> existing limits of house. 0 <br /> 2. Existing house is too close to waterline and side line. A vari- <br /> ance would be required for any addition. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> c. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #594. Motion by Dahlk second by Voges to grant a variance of 27 feet <br /> from required setback from Breunig Road as per finding of fact. !` <br /> 1. Building will replace 3 old buildings in same location. <br /> 2. Building cannot be located elsewhere because of waterway and loca <br /> tion of other buildings in farm yard. <br /> 3. Building will be set back of existing buildings along road and <br /> will not impair traffic. <br /> 4. Any road improvement will be made to opposite side of road. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1 <br /> fr <br />