Laserfiche WebLink
IMAM) HP AMJW:'I'MPN'I' <br /> Octohet l',, I'11I1 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 41 101. Miller/Harvey deny; uune(T.es;>ar.y hardship was not proven. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Field inspection disclosed that building could to located on the pro- <br /> perty without a variance. <br /> 2) . Building was constructed without a zoning permit. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> -a) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. <br /> h) . Self-imposed hardship. <br /> Motion carried. 5-0. <br /> #1310. Harvey/Schwahr, grant the Special Exception Permit subject to the <br /> following: <br /> 1) . Permit granted as per plans submitted. <br /> 2) . The filled and/or graded and disturbed areas shall be sodded or seeded <br /> with fast growing grasses and mulched to prevent siltation or erosion. <br /> 3) . The applicaint shall request inspection by the Dane County Zoning <br /> Department upon completion of the project. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . The project as planned, with specified conditions; will not result in <br /> substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, sedimentation, im- <br /> pairment of fish or aquatic life, or safe and healthful con.it.ions. <br /> Motion carried. 5-0. <br /> #1311. Schwahn/Harvey grant a variance of 5 feet from the required right <br /> side yard. <br /> (1/, FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Existing residence is nonconforming as to side yard. <br /> 2) . Other location of the addition is not feasible. <br /> 3) . Neighbor will not respond to offers to purchase enough land to provide <br /> compliance. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried. 5-0. <br /> #1312. Miller/Schwahn deny. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Applicant proposes to stock up to 45 head of yearling cattle on the pro- <br /> perty. <br /> 2) . Existing buildings, lawn and driveway use up a considerable area. <br /> 3) . Manure build up is a potential problem for area residents especially <br /> during the growing and harvest seasons. <br /> 4) . Applicant owns a dairy farm in another location on which yearlings could <br /> be maintained. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. <br /> Motion carried. 5-0, <br /> #1313. Schwahn/Miller grant a variance of 6500 square feet from required <br /> area of proposed Lot #3 and to deny setback variance for the addition to the <br /> recreation building. <br />