1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Minutes December 20, 1984 • Page 2 40 IN FAVOR: R. Gerstner OPPOSED: None COMMUNICATION: Town Board in favor. TOWN BOARD: In favor. The public hearing was closed. #1321. Miller/Schwahn grant a variance of 12 feet, more or less from the required setback from CTH BB, subject to the condition that the entryway shall be removed at the owners expense if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Existing residence, built in latter 1800's, is nonconforming as to setback. 2) . Basement portion of residence is entirely within the required set- back and therefore a complying location for the basement entry is not possible. 3) . Entry will be constructed as far from road as is possible. Side of house is substantially closer to the road. CONChiIS TON: a) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. h) . Vari anco is not contrary to right.; of others or to the public in- terest. c) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. 5-0. • #1322. Schwahn/Miller grant a variance of 6 feet more or less, from the required left side yard and a variance of 16 feet from the required set- back from the normal high water mark_ FINDING OF FACT: 1) . proposed addition is second story above existing residence; there will be no further encroachment into side yard or shoreland setback. 2) . Existing residence was constructed prior to ordinances, and is non- conforming as to sideyard and setback from water. The second story addition may not be permitted without a variance. .CONCLUSION: a) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. b) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. c) . Hardship is caused by the oridnance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. 5-0. #1323. Krushchke/Schwahn to grant avar.iance of 35 feet, more or less, from the required loft side yard for'-barn. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Required side yard would encroach into the paddock area of adja- cent riding stable. 2) . Ordinance intent of barn separation from adjacent property is rendered mcaninglc , , because adjacuut riding stable also accommodates livestock and in greater numbers than the barn in question. CONCLUSION_ a) . Proven ca!; ' o f nnnl'et'•;,;<try• ha r(tr;Ih i h) . Val Inlll'a-, i tit!! l'iJlll ! al I 1Miit �: alt � 1h�'Iq ��I Ihl' ICII��IIl. i ntl,ror:t .