1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i 1 1 1 I n l r`1• ? /, 1 9 H it Page 2 DECISION OF THE BOARD: #1291 ; Miller/Schwahn grant a variance of 6 feet, more or less from re- quired left side yard. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Residence has only a single car attached garage; other residences in area have 2 car attached garages. 2) . An unattached garage could be built to the rear of the property but drive access would not be possible because of steep downward slope a rear of residence a drop of approximately 20 feet. CONCLUSION; 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. 3) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest Motion carried. #1292: Harvey/Schwahn deny: FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Drainage easement at rear of property is a natural swale. Complying location of residence would not affect the easement and with proper landscaping drainage along the easement would not adversely affect the residence. 2) . The lot is of good size 340' more or less along the front line with an average depth of 215' more or less. Providing full consideration for well, septic area and drainage easement there is still substan- tial area in which a residence could be located without a variance. CONCLUSION: 1) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried. #1293: Schwahn/Miller grant a variance of 15.5.. feet, more or less from the required setback from town road. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . The town road is actually an dead-end in-drive to this property and not used by the general public. 2) . Proposed addition is a passive solar "sun room" and exempt from restriction as per ss 63.031 State Statutes. 3) . Passive solar would not be feasible on any other side of residence. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interes . Motion carried. #1295. Miller/Schwahn grant a variance of 2.5 feet more or less from the required setback from normal high water mark and grant the special exception permit as proposed. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Repair of seawalls is necessary as they are being undercut and washed by wave actions 2) . Boathouse addition would not extend to the end of existing seawall an. would be at the same setback as neighboring boathouses.