1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD) OF AIIJ[lr'PMHN'I' - Minutes June 0, P)04 Pagr' 2 #1269. Appeal by Robert Hibbard II for a variance from required side and rear yard as provided by Section 10.13 (6) &. (7) to permit re-zone of existing building at 5378 Blue Bill Park Road in the SW 1/4 SE 1/4 - Lot #9, Blue Bill Park - Section 22, Town of Westport. IN FAVOR: R. Hibbard OPPOSED: None COMMUNICATION: Town Board and Plan Commission, no objection #1270. Appeal by Jeff Klehfoth for a variance from required sideyard and lot width as provided by Section 10.071 (4) (c) & (7) to permit conversion of single family residence to duplex at 4348 Jordan Drive in the SW 1/4 SE 1/4 - Section 8, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: J. Klehfoth OPPOSED: None COMMUNICATION: Town Board in favor. • #1271. Appeal by Richard& Anne Shull for a Special Exception Permit as provided by Section 11.05 (g) to permit filling, grading, etc. , . within 300 feet of Lake Mendota on Lot #2, CSM 3452 - Section 5, So. Town of Westport. TN_FAVOR_ Dave Polich, Amble Landscaping - representing Shull's. OPPOSED: None COMMUNICATION: Town Board and Plan Commission - no objection ' The public hearing was closed. CV #1264. Miller/Harvey to grant a variance of 0.1 feet from required setback from front property line. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . 0. 1 foot is 1 inch, more or less. Measurements of that close of a distance could vary either way depending upon equipment utilized, . etc. 2) . 0.1 foot encroachment would not cause any adverse effect. 3) . Compliance with required setback would require major structural altera tion. CONCLUSION: 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interes . Motion carried. #1265. Miller/Harvey to grant a variance of 3 feet, more or less, from requir d right side yard. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Building will replace old nonconforming garage. 2) . Other residential and accessory buildings in this area are as close or closer to side lot lines. 3) . Garage placed farther back on lot would encroach into flood zone area. and soft ground due to high water table. . CONCLUSION: 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. 3. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interes . 4) Motion carried.