Laserfiche WebLink
[WARD 01' 111),r(J:J'l'MI'N'r - M i note ft <br /> Mny ;d, t')t34 <br /> Page 4 <br /> (11111) <br /> CONCLUS I OD : <br /> 1) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1255. Kruschke/Harvey to grant a variance of 3 feet, more or less, from re- <br /> quired left yard: <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Residential is nonconforming as to side yard. <br /> 2) . Addition will not encroach further into the side yard than the existing <br /> residence. <br /> 3) . A 3 foot jog in the addition would not provide any realistic side yard <br /> benefit. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1256. Schwahn/Kruschke to hold in abeyance and ask for: 1) . Alternate plan <br /> for the proposed construction providing more consideration of setback require- <br /> ments and 2) . Request a plan for proposed future expansion of the facility to <br /> alleviate Karems routine practice of after-the-fact applications. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Cir #1257. Harvey/Schwan to grant a variance of 23 feet, more or less, from <br /> required rear yard: <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Parcel has shallow front to back depth. Required setback from road and <br /> required rear yard eliminate any buildable area unless a variance were granted <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> • <br /> 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1258. Kruschke/Harvey to deny, applicant/agent did not appear at the public <br /> hearing; motion carried. <br /> #1259. Kruschke/Schwahn to grant the permit as proposed subject to the <br /> following instructions: <br /> 1) . Permit granted as per plans submitted. <br /> 2) . Banks of new ditches and existing ditch banks which have been disturbe• <br /> by the dredging shall be seeded with ast growing grasses and mulched <br /> to prevent siltation or erosion. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Project is in the public interest. <br /> 2) . Proposed engineering includes erosion and siltation control. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> The project as planned with specified conditions; will not result in subst. <br /> tial detriment to havigable waters by erosion, sedimentation, impairment <br /> of fish or aquatic life, or safe and healthful conditions. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> • <br />