1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Minutes October 27, 1983 Page 5 .j • 4. Farm building/complex is restricted because of hill rising behind buildings to the West. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or tb the public in- terest. 3) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. #1204. Schwahn/Harvey grant a variance of 32.5 feet, more or less, from the required setback from Marshall Road. FINDING OF FACT: 1. Addition is to end of existing nonconforming building addition will not encroach any closer to road. 2. -Addition will be farther from road than other buildings. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried. #1205. Purcell/Kruschke grant a variance of 524 square feet from maximum permitted area and 3 feet from maximum permitted height. FINDING OF FACT: 1. Existing residence is very small; Only 680 square feet, was used for summer cottage only but will now be renovated and enlarged for a retirement home. 2. Size of building is required to store boat, canoes, dock, etc. Height is required because of motor home camper. 3. Other garages in the area are as large or larger. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. Motion carried. #1206. Harvey/Schwahn grant a variance of 31 feet from the required set- back from USH 51. FINDING OF FACT: 1. Highway is being re-located and future setback will be 63 feet from centerline - 30 foot right-of-way. 2. Property is only 1/2 lot; there is no other location available for . the garage. 3. Other properties in the area have garages as close to the road. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is necessary to proivde right enjoyed by others. 3) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public in- terest. Motion carried. (1.0