|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1983
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
BOA
>
BOA Minutes
>
1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2016 11:00:11 AM
Creation date
5/6/2016 11:00:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment - Minutes <br /> September 22, 1983 <br /> Page 6 <br /> (110, <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> 2) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1194. Motion by Kruschke, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 30 fee- <br /> more or less, from required setback from normal high waterline. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> - 1. Existing residence is non-conforming as to setback from water. <br /> 2. Fire damage is less than 50% and building is structurally sound. <br /> 3. Renovation/alteration will be approximately 60 feet from waterline <br /> but cannot be done without variance. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public into <br /> 3) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1195. Motion by Purcell, second by Schwahn to grant a variance of 7 feet, <br /> more or less, from the required setback from U.S.H. 151, Park Street, with <br /> the condition that the addition shall be removed at the owners expense if <br /> future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> (IF 1. Addition to side or rear of building is not practical because of str <br /> tural and lay-out design. <br /> 2. This area is intermixed between properties which are located in the <br /> City of Madison and those located in the town. Properties located i <br /> the City have a less restrictive setback and several buildings are <br /> located much closer to the road than the proposed addition. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible with <br /> injustice to applicant. <br /> 3) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> 4) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Motion by Schwahn_ second by Kruschke to adjourn. <br /> Meeting adjourned at 8:54 p.m. <br /> Phyllis Schwahn, <br /> Secretary RECEIVED <br /> Minutes were filed with Dane County Clerk's Office on S E P 2 1983 <br /> Dane County Clerk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.