1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

IMAM OF AI,ius! I NT - Minutes l ir('t,ml ir,r 1 ' , l i to i 11;0410 , Paw, 4 1 #1217. Krushchke/Miller to grant a permanent variance of 20 feet from the requi rod s ethaci< From Carptenter. Road f,-or. Lots 13, 14, 38, 39 and 40; the variance is to remain in effect until such time that the mobile home park use is terminated. Also, to grant a variance relative to the existing struc- tures on said lots and as necessary to allow said structures to remain. This secondary variance for existing structures shall terminate as said structures are removed from the lots. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . The mobile home park with trailer hook-ups for utilities was existing prior to the dedication of the town road. 2) . Dedication of the road with the resulting required setbacks caused undue space restriction on the mobile home lots. 3) . Variance, as granted, provides that homes and related structures will eventually be farther from the road than at present, thereby improving the overall situation. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 3) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public in- terest. Motion carried. #1218. Schwahn/Miller to grant a variance of 20 feet, more or less, from the maximum permitted height of an on-premise sign. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . I-System intersection overpass/underpass and an adjacent terrain block li the sight of a regulation height sign. 2) . Much of The patron traffic is expected to 'utilize the I-System when • traveling to the theater and a convenient sign identification is neces- sary to alert them to the proper turn-off-preventing confusion, etc. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public in- terest. Motion carried. #1219. Krushchke/Schwahn to grant a variance of 6 feet, more or less, from the required setback from Arbordale Court. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Addition is a solar panel unit and will not be utilized as a room. The unit is located in the only feasible location due to existing driveway, trees, etc. Other location would require removal of trees or blockage of drive. 2) . Town Board recommended approval. i CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 3) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public in- terest. Motion carried. i t