1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

IOAIdJ OP J\U,IIJ`-i'1'MI,NP - Minikes April ;R, 1'1,31 Page 3 CV) CONCLUSION:ON; 1 -T-Iardship is self-created. 2. Additional. variance is not warranted in this situation. The building was constructed in excess of regulations to begin with. 3. Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried. #1144. Motion by Harvey, second by Krushcke to grant a variance of 21 feet, more or less, from the required setback from Dairy Ridge Road. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Zoning Ordinance requires variance for any alteration that does not comply with regulations. 2) . Alterations are entirely within the existing non-conforming building, no further encroachment into setback will be made. CONCLUSION: 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2 . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. #1145. Motion by Schwahn, second by Harvey to grant a variance of 27; more or less, from The required setback from USH 12. Condition: The addition shall be removed at the owners expense if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. CV FINDING OF FACT: 1) . The addition will be in line with the existing building and will not cause further encroachment into setback. 2) . Moving the building farther back will cause restriction of existing feed lot. 3) . Building is farther from highway than other existing building. CONCLUSION: 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest ' Motion carried. #1146. Motion by Harvey, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 21 feet; more or less, from the required setback from Felland Road. CONDITION: The addition shall be removed at the owners expense if future road improve- ment requires additional right-of-way. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . The existing residence is almost entirely non-conforming as to set- back. Practical addition to the building cannot be made without a variance. 2) . Addition will be in line with existing building. CONCLUSION:_ 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest, Motion carried. #1147. Motion by Kruschke, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 8 feet from required setback from Woodland Drive. CONDITION: The pertinent portion of the addition shall be removed at the owners expense if future road improve- ment requires additional right-of-way.