1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MinuLes April 20, inR:l Page 2 (;) #1146. Appeal by James L. Mortenson for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10. 17 (3) (h) to permit addition to resi- dence at 50.3( Feiland Road in the SW 1/4 SE 1/4 -• Lot #1 , C.S.M. 3085 - Section 26, Town of Burke. TN FAVOR: J. L. Mortenson 'OPPO4;FD: None COMMUNICATION: Letter TOWN BOARD: In favor. #1147. Appeal by William Endres for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17 (3) (b) to permit new agricultural acces- sory building at 6572 Woodland Drive in the SW 1/4 SW 1/4 - Section 12, Town of Springfield. IN FAVOR: Win. Endres OPPOSED: None COMMUNICATION: Letter; town board in favor. #1148. Appeal by Michael Duerst for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17 (3) (b) to permit construction of silo at 7313 Schaller Road in the NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 4, Town of Montrose. IN FAVOR: M. Duerst OPPOSED: None COMMUNICATION: Letter; town board in favor. The public hearing was closed. #1142. Motion by Schwahn, second by Harvey to grant a variance of 17 feet, more or less, from the required setback from Woodland Drive with the condition: The building shall be removed at the owners expense if future road improvement requires additional right,-of-way. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Building cannot be located farther back because it will restrict access to silos. If moved to the West it would encroach into cropland. 2) . The building will not encroach any closer to the road than existing buildings on the property and will replace the older shed which is only 35 feet from the centerline, thus, improving the situation. CONCLUSION: 1. Proven case of unnecessary.hardship. 2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interesi . Motion carried. #1143. Motion by Kruschke, second by Schwahn to deny. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Two variances were granted to Mr. Graves when he constructed the building in 1968. These were a 5 foot variance from required rear yard in order to provide required parking and a 7,416 square feet variance from required lot. area. 2) . Building has been utilized for a combination of apartments and offices, conversion to additional apartments with less office space is a desire of the owner; it is not a requirement. Building ) can still be utilized as is.