1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT October 28, 1982 Page 2 (OA) #1109. Appeal by Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Duesler for a variance from required setback from right-of-way line as provided by Section 10.17 (4) to permit an addition to residence at 4902 Wakanda Drive, Lot #14, Block 2, Morris Park - Section 33, Town of Westport. IN FAVOR: T. Duesler OPPOSED: None COMMUNICATION: Letter; town board, in favor. LETTER: E. Schimer, neighbor, no objection. #1110. Appeal by the Randall Bank for a variance from required setback from right-of-way and required certificate of compliance as provided by Section 10.17 (1) and 10.25 (4) to permit existing location and occupancy of buildings at 5262 Verona Road, Lot #.3 Willow Run, Section 6, Town of Fitchbur•. IN FAVOR: Attorney Dick Glesner, representing Randall Bank; Steve Osterhaus, Sr. V.P. Randall Bank OPPOSED: None COMMUNICATION: None The public hearing was closed. #1104. Motion by Harvey, second by Schwahn, to grant a variance of 36 feet from the required lot width for each lot. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Area is part of an older non-conforming plat; many lots have less than the proposed lot width. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. 3) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried. #1105. Motion by Kruschke, second by Schwahn to deny. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Contractor, R. Holtz testified that lot stakes were not located and building was located by assumption. 2) . Field inspection by the board disclosed that building could be moved farther back without too much of a problem, possibly without requiring additional fill, depending on the actual distance required. If addi- tional fill is required it would be a minimal addition to the new fill which was placed to permit construction of the building. The addi- tional fill would create no more of a drainage or water run-off pro- blem than the fill already placed. CONCLUSION: 1) . Self-imposed hardship. 2) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried. #1106. Motion by Harvey, second by Schwahn to deny. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Zoning Ordinance provides that accessory building may be only 50% of the floor area of the residence on the property; there is no existing residence on the property. 2) . Applicant is not certain when a residence will be constructed; esti- mated in 1985.