1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMI NT - Minutes December 16, 1982 Page 3 460 5. The applicant shall request inspection by the Dane County Zoning Department upon completion of the project. FINDING OF FACT: 1. Spoils resulted from clean-out and improvement of trout rearing ponds and were dispersed in a non-critical area on Department of Natural Resources property. CONCLUSION: 1) . The project as planned, with specified conditions; will not result in substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, sedimenta- tion, impairment offish or aquatic life, or safe and healthful conditions. Motion carried. #1121. Motion by Purcell, second by Schwahn to grant the Special Exception Permit as proposed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Permit granted as per plans submitted. 2. All spoils shall be spread and leveled. 3. The applicant shall request inspection by the Dane County Zoning Department upon completion of the project. FINDING OF FACT: 1. Project is necessary to improve the wet condition of the golf course particularly in spring. 2. Ponds and fill are located out of the flood way of the creek. CONCLUSION: 1) . The project as planned, with specified conditions; will not result in substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, sedimenta- tion, impairment of fish or aquatic life, or safe and healthful conditions. Motion carried. #1122. Motion by Kruschke, second by Purcell to hold in abeyance for 1 month to provide time for the Board to re-inspect the property and review pertinent information. Motion carried. #1123. Motion by Harvey, second by Schwahn to grant a variance of 18 1/2 feet, more or less, from the required setback from Felland Road with the condition that the entry addition shall be removed at the owners expense if suture road improvement requires additional right-of-way. FIND'LNG OF FACT: 1. Entry location change was necessary to provide for customer safety. 2. Entry could not be located farther back on building because of existing stairway to second floor apartment. Other location/s would require major remodel and use change of existing rooms, ie: tavern kitchen, etc. 3. Existing building is approximately 100 years old and is non-conforming as to setback. Addition is in-line with front of building and will not encroach farther into setback area. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried.