Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Minutes <br /> July 22, 1982 <br /> Page 3 <br /> #1085. Motion by Harvey, second by Purcell to hold in abeyance to provide <br /> time for applicant to review alternate locations. Motion carried. <br /> #1086. Motion by Purcell, second by Harvey to grant a variance of 5 feet <br /> from required setback from Burr Oaks Street property line with conditions <br /> as follows: 1) . Property access shall be limited to the existing ingress <br /> and egress. 2) . Trash dumpster shall be emptied only during the daytime. <br /> 3) . The addition shall be removed at the owners expense if future road <br /> improvement requires additional right-of-way. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Competitive drive-ins have a drive-up window. <br /> 2) . Much of the surrounding area is within the City of Madison and re- <br /> quired setback is 0 feet if construction is located over 25 feet <br /> from a residence district. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> 3) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1087. Motion by Harvey, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 12 feet <br /> from the required setback from C.T.H. "J" and 6 feet from required left <br /> side yard with the conditions: 1) . The side yard variance is granted for <br /> a renewable. energy system as provided by ss 59.99 (7) (b) - W.S. and any <br /> construction authorized by this variance shall not be used for any other <br /> purpose. 2) . The additions to front of residences shall be removed at the <br /> owners expense if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . The existing residence is non-conforming as to setback. Front addi- <br /> tions will not be closer to the road than the existing front of the <br /> building. <br /> 2) . The side yard variance is required for a solar greenhouse addition <br /> which will provide approximately 15% of the heating for the resi- <br /> dence. Location other than as proposed would result in loss of <br /> • efficiency and/or increased costs. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1088. Motion by Purcell, second by Harvey to grant a variance of 13 feet, <br /> more or less, from required setback from Shadyside Street, a variance of 7 <br /> feet (more or less) from required right side and a variance of 4 feet 2 inches <br /> (more or less) from required left side yard, with conditions: <br /> 1) . The addition to front of residence shall be removed at the owners expense <br /> if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. <br /> 2) . This variance is granted for a renewable energy system as provided by <br /> ss 59.99 (7) (d) W.S. and any construction authorized by this variance <br /> shall not--be used for any other purpose. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Addition will connect existing garage to residence and will not be <br /> closer to the road than the garage. <br /> . <br /> • <br /> ;, <br />