1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Minutes July 22, 1982 Page 4 Lig 2) . Addition on right side will be only slightly closer to the property. line- and left side addition is for a solar heating area. Location elsewhere is prevented by orientation of the existing buildings. Reduced area to provide side yard compliance would result in loss of efficiency for the solar system. 3) . Blockage of access to lake side of residence is no concern as stated by Mr. Wheeler; septic will be replaced by holding tanks located in front and garage can be provided with another large door on the lake- side 4) . Other residences in the area encroach as far or farther into required -yards and setback. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship_ 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. Motion carried. #1089. Motion by Harvey, second by Purcell to grant a variance of .15 feet, more or less from required setback from right-of-way, with the condition that the garage shall be removed at the owners expense if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Complying location of the addition is prevented by location of septic -mound system, sewer lines and the large willow tree. CONCLUSION: Proven case of unnecessary hardship. Motion carried: #1079. C. Swacina - Lot #47 and E 1/2 #48, Brickson Park - Dunn held in abeyance. Revised location submitted. Motion by Purcell, second by Harvey to grant a variance of 28, more or less, feet from the required setback from Jordan Drive with the condition that the garage shall be removed at the owners expense- if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. FINDING OF: FACT: 1) . Angle of right-of-way across the property and large tree prevent complying location. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. #876. Control Tower Truck Stop Section 4, Burke. Board of Adjustment inspection discloses that conditions of the Special Exception Permit have not been complied with. Specifically - 1) . Required shrubs, etc. , have not been planted and 2) . at least two areas of the buffer strip and slope have been eroded: Motion by Purcell, second by Harvey to direct the Zoning Department to take appropriate enforcement action. Motion carried. #1075. J. Starry - Paoli, Section 3, Town of Montrose. Zoning inspection has disclosed that setback distances submitted were in error. Amendment to variance is necessary to -permit construction as it exists. All other factors of variance remain the same. Motion by Harvey, second by AMA . :