1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES Juno 24, 1982 Page 2 (g) to permit installation of field drain tile in the SE1/4 SE 1/4 Section 4::) 34 Town of Cross Plains. IN FAVOR: J. Connors OPPOSED: none COMMUNICATION: none #1081. Appeal by John Sveum/ Yahara Builders for a variance from required setback from front property line as provided by Sec. 1017 (4) to permit existing location of a residential garage at 3008 Shadyside Drive, Lot 2 Atkinson's Addition to Crystal Springs, Section 30 Town of Pleasant Springs IN FAVOR: J. Sveum OPPOSED: none COMMUNICATION: none #1082. Appeal by Paul Francois for a Special Exception Permit to construct ponds within 300 feet of a tributary of the Sugar River as provided by Sec. 11.05 (g) . Ponds will be located in the N 1/2 Section 27 Town of Montrose. IN FAVOR: P. Francois OPPOSED: none COMMUNICATION: none #1083. Appeal by Stauffer and Sons, Inc. for a variance from required set- back from road as provided by Sec. 1017 (2) to permit existing location of new addition to building at 2819 C.T.H. "F" , NW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 7 Town of Blue Mounds. NO APPEARANCES; Mr. Stauffer had called the Zoning Department and informed them that he wished to withdraw the appeal, the State Highway Department has agreed to realign the right-of-way to provide the required setback for the building. The public hearing was closed. Lir #1075. Motion by Purcell 2'nd by Harvey to grant a variance of 3.2 feet, more or less, from the required setback from Canal St. and 3.0 feet , more or less, from the required setback form Range Trail. FINDING OF FACT: 1. Construction will replace old deteriorated porch which was removed and will not encroach into the setback areas any further than the old porch. 2. Existing residence is nonconforming as to setback, any porch or entry on the front would require a variance. CONCLUSION: 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship 2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest 3. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self imposed Motion carried. #1076. Motion by Harvey 2'nd by Purcell to grant the Special Exception Per- mit as proposed with the following conditions:1. The filled and/or graded and disturbed areas shall be sodded or seeded with fast growing grasses and mulched to prevent siltation or erosion. 2. The applicant shall request inspection by the Dane County Zoning Dept. upon completion of the project. FINDING OF FACT 1. Project will protect shoreline and improve property 2. Proposed grade and the minimal amount of fill will not cause siltation, erosion, etc. , if area is sodded or seeded. CONCLUSION 1. The project as planned with the specified conditions will not result in substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, sedimentation, impairment of fish or aquatic life, or safe and healthful conditions. Motion carried. #1077. Motion by Purcell 2'nd by Harvey to grant the Special Exception Per- mit as proposed with the following conditions: 1.The filled and/or graded