Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF AD;1t1STMLNT - MinuLPs <br /> • <br /> May 27, 1982 <br /> Page 5 <br /> 4) . The residence could have been located in compliance. <br /> 5) . All information, stakes, etc. were available to builder and <br /> owner to enable them to make informed decisions with regard <br /> to the construction of the residence. The setback and side <br /> yard encroachments were a result of their own mistake, ne- <br /> gligence, or direct actions. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1066. Motion by Harvey, second by Schwahn to grant the permit as per <br /> plans submitted and with the following conditions: <br /> 1) . All spoils shall be spread and leveled. <br /> 2) . The filled and/or graded and disturbed areas shall be sodded <br /> or seeded with fast growing grasses and mulched to prevent <br /> siltation or erosion. <br /> 3) . The applicant shall request inspection by the Dane County Zonin <br /> Department upon completion of the project. ' <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . The pond and heat pump project should conserve energy. <br /> 2) . The fill to improve the lot is approximately 100 feet from the <br /> river . <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . The project as planned, with specified conditions; will not <br /> result in substantial detriment to navigable waters by ero- <br /> CitSion, sedimentation, impairment of fish or aquatic life, or <br /> safe and healthful conditions. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1067. Motion by Schwahn, second by Kruschke to deny:. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . The Mahoney's will re-design right side addition to alleviate • <br /> the necessity for a variance. <br /> 2) . Inspection by the Board disclosed that a screened-in porch <br /> • <br /> could be constructed on the left side of the residence without <br /> requiring a variance. Said porch could be of a substantial siz=; <br /> 6 foot width at rear, 11 foot width at front (average width <br /> 8. 5 ft. ) and a length of 22 feet, plus. <br /> 3) . There have been no other side yard variances granted in this <br /> area. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1068. Motion by Kruschke, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 3. : <br /> acres, more or less, from required lot area and a variance of 100 feet, <br /> more or less, from required lot width, for raising of rabbits. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Raising of rabbits requires a minimal area. They will be <br /> 4L) caged within an enclosed building. • <br /> 2) . Requiring 5 acres of land for this purpose would only result <br /> in unnecessary waste of land. <br /> • <br />