1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

alv111NV V1 1 “.,C U CONCLUSION: - � Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 3) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. Voges, abstained from voting. #1069. Motion by Schwahn, second by Kruschke to deny: • FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Residence was :built for Schappe but an enclosed porch was not included nor was an area provided for future addition. 2) . A screened-in, unattached to residence, structure could be per- mitted on the property. 3) . There have been no side yard variances granted in this area. CONCLUSION: 1) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried. #1070. Motion by Harvey, _second by Schwahn to grant a variance of 15 feet from required setback from Anderberg Drive and 38 feet from re- quired rear yard. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Proposed construction is second story headroom and width expan- sion of existing non-conforming residence. Second story will not extend beyond the existing building. 2) . Width improvement cannot be made without a variance. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 3) . Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. Motion carried. #1071. Motion by Purcell, second by Kruschke to grant a variance of 7 feet from required right side yard. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . New garage will not be closer to lot line than the old one was. 2) . Neighbors in the area have one and two car garages which are as close or closer to side lot lines. CONCLUSION: 1) . Proven case of unnecessary hardship. 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. Motion carried. #1072. Motion by Schwahn, second by Purcell to grant the Special Excep- tion Permit with the following conditions : 1) . The filled and/or graded and disturbed areas shall be sodded or seeded with fast growing grasses and mulched to prevent silta- tion or erosion. 2) . The pond shall be constructed as per S.C.S. specifications. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Reclamation of the mineral extraction pit North of the creek is required by County Zoning Ordinance. Reclamation of the pit area South of the creek is voluntary but preferred over leaving the area as is. A fish and wildlife pond properly constructed could • be a beneficial reclamation.