|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
BOA
>
BOA Minutes
>
1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2016 11:20:27 AM
Creation date
5/6/2016 11:16:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I` •r l l i 't AI H :t i l l <br /> !; pt,'ml,er 24, I'M I <br /> Pact(' 4 <br /> CFINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1 . Proposed entry is farther back from road than the residence. <br /> 2. Entry addition could not be built without a variance. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1. Proven case or unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1024. Motion by Harvey, second by Schwahn to grant a variance of 17 feel <br /> from required setback from C.T.H. "Y". CONDITION: The building or <br /> pertinent portion thereof shall be removed at the owners expense if <br /> future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Proposed building replaces two old buildings-located in same <br /> area. <br /> 2. Proposed building is farther from.road than other buildings. <br /> 3. Farm-yard complex is restricted in possible building area because <br /> of highway on East and South , location fields to North and West <br /> and existing buildings. <br /> 4. Location will preserve productive cropland. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> CP, <br /> #1025. Motion by Kruschke, second by Harvey to grant the Special <br /> Exception Permit as proposed. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Beaches are for public use. <br /> 2. "Dry Beach" design will substantially prevent erosion of sand and <br /> alleviate necessity of replacement of more than 1 or 2 loads of <br /> sand per year on each beach. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> The project as planned, will not result in substantial detriment to <br /> navigable waters by erosion, sedimentation, impairment of fish or <br /> aquatic life, or safe and healthful conditions and in fact should <br /> improve these conditions. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #1026. Motion by Purcell , second by Schwahn to grant a variance of 32 <br /> feet from required rear yard. <br /> FINDING OP PACT: <br /> 1 . Pool I i(Id i t i rnt is necessary to provide exercise therapy t:o prevent <br /> atrophy of applicants log. <br /> 2. Location of house, septic system, existing trees , and deed re- <br /> striction side yard of 20 feet complicate complying location of <br /> addition. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> L.; <br /> Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.