Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> Minutes - June 26, 1980 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 411110. COMMUNICATION: Letter, Dane County Highway, no comment or objection to <br /> appeals. <br /> The public hearing was closed. <br /> #892. Motion by Voges, second by Purcell to grant a variance of 2 miles, <br /> more or less, from the maximum distance a directory sign may be located <br /> from the business advertised. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Sign was installed prior to Dane County Sign Regulations. <br /> 2. If the sign is removed the State will not permit a relocation othe <br /> than in a commercial district; there are no commerical sites availa <br /> ble. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #893. Motion by Kruschke, second by Schwahn to grant a variance of 3 <br /> feet from required left side yard. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Existing residence is non-conforming as to side yard. <br /> 2. Addition will be in-line with the residence and will not be closer <br /> to side lot line. <br /> (1110 3. Many, if not the majority, of the residences in this area are <br /> non-conforming as to location and variances have been granted for <br /> additions, etc. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> b. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> c. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #894. Motion by Schwahn, second by Kruschke to deny the variance request <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Residence was constructed recently and could have been located to <br /> provide room for the desired deck. <br /> 2. A slab patio, flush with the ground, is not required to comply wit <br /> yard requirements. <br /> 3. R-3 Zoning, is available which permits a 25 foot rear yard. Rear <br /> yard provided is 27 feet and deck would be in compliance. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> a. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> b. Other alternatives than a variance are available. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #895. Motion by Voges, second by Schwahn to grant a variance of 19 feet <br /> from the required setback from normal high waterline. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1;1°. 1. Other residences in the area are as close or closer to the lake. <br /> Required setback for this residence will not provide shoreland protec- <br /> tion, the damage has already been done. <br />