|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
BOA
>
BOA Minutes
>
1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2016 3:45:42 PM
Creation date
5/6/2016 3:45:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B.O.A. - Minutes/10/22/87 <br /> Page 5 <br /> "fir <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Department of Transportation has no objection to locating sign within <br /> their right-of-way. <br /> 2) . Both Plan Commission and Town Board have given approvals. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as possible without <br /> injustice to applicant. <br /> 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #1630. Lein - Christiana. <br /> Miller/Kruschke to grant variance of 9 more or less feet from required setback <br /> centerline of Clearview Road to permit addition to existing residence. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Addition will extend no closer to road than existing residence. <br /> 2) . Addition replaces and expands existing porch in need of repair. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others carried - 4-0. ers or to the public interest. <br /> #1631. Scott Sign - Burke. <br /> Quackenbush/Jones to grant withdraw as per request of attorney for applicant.carried - 4-0. pplicant. <br /> #1632. Voit - Blooming Grove. <br /> Jones/Miller to grant variance of 1.5 feet more or less from required rear and <br /> to permit addition to existing residence. y <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Applicant has reduced size of structure to request minimal variance. <br /> 2) . Applicant has application for rezone in Progress - variance falls more <br /> timely for late start of construction. <br /> 3) . If rezone approved variance not needed. <br /> 4) . Adjoining owners do not object. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #1633. Miller - Dunn. <br /> Kruschke/Miller to hold in abeyance to allow applicant to approach township <br /> regarding the acquisition of adjoining property to remove need for variance. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #1634. Stehr - Westport. <br /> Quackenbush/Jones to deny variance from requested sideyard to permit deck <br /> addition to residence. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Appeal is a re-apply of an earlier denial <br /> emir" structure. pp y (#1213) of request for same <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.