Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT/12/18/86 <br /> Page 3 <br /> C <br /> 1) . Smaller (5 ' x 5 ' ) entry addition was a replacement of an existing <br /> structure in need of repair. <br /> 2). Residence is a converted cheese factory which where historically located <br /> close to roads and neither addition extends nearer than existing building. <br /> 3) . Immediately behind residence a severe uphill slope commences. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1 ) . Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as possible without <br /> injustice to applicant. <br /> 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried - 5-0. <br /> #1520. Hanson - Oregon. <br /> Jones/Kruschke to hold in abeyance, until next Board of Adjustment Hearing, to <br /> allow applicant to provide Zoning Department Staff with landscaping plan or <br /> redesign of structure in order to reduce variance requested. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1 ) . Bringing grade to existing entryway could alleviate need for variance. <br /> 2) . Redesign of structure could reduce variance requested. <br /> Motion carried - 5-0. <br /> #1521 . Christensen - Pleasant Springs. <br /> Quackenbush/Kruschke to grant variance from setback to normal high waterline <br /> to allow addition to residence to extend not more than 14 feet from said <br /> existing residence. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1 ) . Proposed addition will replace existing deck. <br /> 2) . Proposed addition would not obstruct neighbors view of water. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as possible without <br /> injustice to applicant. <br /> 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried - 5-0. <br /> #1522. Howell/Vienna. <br /> Quackenbush/Miller to deny variance from setback to I-90/94 right-of-way. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1 ) . Structure was erected without first contacting any local or municipal <br /> authority regarding permits or location. <br /> 2). Structure could be attached to existing building or re-located without <br /> need for variance. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. <br /> Motion carried - 5-0. <br /> #1523. Royal Manor Apartments - Madison. <br /> Quackenbush/Miller to hold in abeyance pending further input from township <br /> also allow applicant additional time to prepare alternative plans. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1 ) . Applicant has offered several alternative parking plans available for <br /> Next hearing. <br /> 2). Alteration of units was done without required permits. <br /> 3) . Board has yet to receive input from township. <br />