Laserfiche WebLink
1 A <br /> Board of Adjustment/Minutes/12/19/85 <br /> Page 2 <br /> IN FAVOR: R. Storlie <br /> OPPOSED: None <br /> COMMUNICATION: None <br /> #1429. Appeal by Robert Stein for a variance from required rearyard and lot <br /> coverage as provided by Sections 10.16 (6) (a) 2. & 10.07 (5) to permit <br /> construction of new residence and boathouse also for a Special Exception <br /> Permit as provided by Section 11.05 (3) to permit filling, grading, etc. , <br /> within 300 feet of Lake Mendota at 5025 St. Cyr Road in Lot #4, West Point <br /> Park - Section 6, So. - Town of Westport. <br /> IN FAVOR: R. Stein <br /> OPPOSED: None <br /> COMMUNICATION: None <br /> #1430. Appeal by Pat Roggensack, . agent for Dr. Billy Bauman for a variance <br /> from required minimum lot width and lot area as provided by Section 11.03 (1) <br /> to permit land transfer between adjacent lots at 2501 Arboretum Lane & 2551 <br /> Arboretum Drive - W 1/2 SW 1/4 - Part of Government Lot #3, Section 27, Town <br /> of Madison. <br /> IN FAVOR: R. Roggensack, J. Nichol <br /> OPPOSED: None <br /> COMMUNICATION: None <br /> #1431. Appeal by Marvin Knipfer for a variance from required setback from <br /> road as provided by Section 10.17 (2) to permit construction of commercial <br /> building at 4179 CTH AB in the W 1/2 NW 1/4 - Section 13, Town of Blooming <br /> Grove. <br /> IN FAVOR: F. Knipfer <br /> OPPOSED: None <br /> COMMUNICATION: County Highway, Town Board by Voges. <br /> Public hearing was closed - Board rendered following decisions: <br /> #1424. Zimmerman - Middleton. <br /> Miller/Kruschke to grant variance of 6 inches more or less from maximum <br /> permitted height of accessory building for residence garage. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Structure was constructed as per plans submitted. <br /> 2) . Slope of concrete floor of garage, for drainage purposes, creates <br /> need for variance. <br /> 3) . Applicant has conversion van with luggage rack which requires larger <br /> than average door height. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as possible without <br /> injustice to applicant. <br /> 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried, 5-0. <br /> #1425. Pomeranke - Vienna. <br /> Schwahn/Miller to grant variance of 41.5 feet more or less from required <br />