1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES/10/25/90 Page 4 2). V.F.W. Membership expansion requires facility enlargement. 3). Front 6 feet of encroaching addition is for handicapped access. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 2). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. Motion carried - 4-0. #2054 Appeal by Michael and Diane Lambert for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17(2) to permit addition/alteration of existing residence at 1789 CTH V in the NW 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 12, Town of Bristol. IN FAVOR: M. Lambert OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: County Highway Rendall/Quackenbush to grant, with condition, variance of 22 more or less feet from required setback to centerline CTH V to permit second story addition over existing structure. CONDITION: 1). The addition shall be removed at the owner's expense if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Addition is to be over existing structure with no further encroachment. 2). Existing residence is virtually all within required setback as exists. 3). County Highway approves with condition. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried - 4-0. #2055 Appeal by Anthony and Joan Helt for a variance from required sideyard as provided by Section 10.071(7) to permit addition to existing residence at 5198 Brabender Road being Lots 1 and 2, Meinholz Addition, Sections 26 and 27, Town of Springfield. IN FAVOR: A. Helt, D. Ripp OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: County Highway Rendall/Quackenbush to grant, with conditions, variance of 7 more or less feet from required sideyard to permit addition to existing residence. CONDITIONS: 1). Subject to rezone to R-3A completed within 90 days. 2). Subject to recording of certified survey map dissolving common lot line between Lots 1 and 2 Meinholz Addition, said recording within 90 days. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Applicant owns 2 lots but was unaware of 2 different zoning districts. 2). Applicant has applied for rezone to make consistant zoning district for both lots. 3). Town Board is in favor. 4). Applicant wishes variance to commence building prior to rezone and CSM. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 2). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without (0110 injustice to applicant.