1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA MINUTES/9/27/90 Page 3 3). Residence is slightly askew on lot and neighbors did not object. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried - 4-0. #2033. Appeal by Alan Brown, agent for George Christensen for a variance from required setback from normal high watermark and sideyard as provided by Sections 11.03(2) and 10.08(7) to permit construction of new residence at 4378 Jordan Drive #2, in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 17, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: A. Brown, G. Christensen OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board. Quackenbush/Harvey to grant, variance of 1.5 feet from minimum setback to normal high watermark, 14 foot variance from required left sideyard and 6' 3" variance from required right sideyard to permit construction of new residence. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Residence replaces old cottage in virtually same location. 2). Required sideyards are 20 feet between buildings. 3). The advent of public sewer has brought many neighbors in for permits with similar variances granted. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 2). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. Motion carried - 4-0. Cre #2034. Appeal by Gary & Elizabeth Brown for a variance from required setback from normal high watermark as provided by Section 11.03(2) to permit deck addition to existing residence at 4378 Jordan Drive #13, in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 17, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: G. Brown, A. Brown OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board Harvey/Quackenbush to grant variance of 28.75 more or less feet from required setback to normal high watermark to permit 7' x 12' second story deck addition to existing residence. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Applicant has similar variance for deck on first floor. 2). Deck will not extend nearer to normal high watermark than does front of existing residence. 3). Similar variances granted in immediate area. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried - 4-0. #2035. Appeal by Milton Hoesly for a variance from required setback from normal high watermark and sideyard as provided by Sections 11.03(2) and 10.08(7) to permit construction of new residence at 4378 Jordan Drive #8 in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 17, Town of Dunn. (1Iw