1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA/MINUTES/1/25/90 (Ow Page 5 Jones/Harvey to hold in abeyance until notification from applicant as to his intentions. Motion carried - 4-0. d) . #1921 - Pietsch - Dunn. Jones/Harvey to grant with condition variance of 19 more or less feet from required centerline setback of USH 51 to permit addition to Garden Center. CONDITION: 1) . Existing poly-house, presently in violation shall be removed by July 1, 1990. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Applicant has revised plans and now wishes 14 foot wide addition into required setback. 2) . Addition will not extend into required setback any further than existing building. 3) . Redesign will significantly reduce requested variance. CONCLUSION: 1) . Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried - 4-0. #1922. Riemen - Dunn. Jones/Quackenbush to hold in abeyance until February 22nd hearing to allow applicant time to provide requested materials. Motion carried - 4-0. #1923. Schubert - Westport. Harvey/Krushcke to hold in abeyacne until February 22nd hearing to allow applicant time to resolve questions from township. Motion carried - 3-0 (Jones - absent) #1925. Roberts - Windsor. Harvey/Jones to hold in abeyance until February 22nd hearing to allow applicant time to provide requested materials. Motion carried - 4-0. #1934. Kornetzkey - Dunn. Quackenbush/Harvey to grant variance of 21 more or less feet from required rearyard to permit uncovered entry stoop to left side of residence. Also, to grant 11 more or less foot variance from required rearyard to permit deck as constructed on lake side of property. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Both additions constructed without permits. 2) . Both structure replace former entrance stoops in need of repair. 3) . Variance #1915 granted for setback to normal high watermark. CONCLUSION: 1) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 2) . Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant.