Laserfiche WebLink
BOA 10/27/94 Minutes <br /> Page 2 <br /> #2570. Appeal by Joseph Edgerton for a variance from required <br /> sideyard as provided by Section 10. 07 (7) to permit residential <br /> addition as constructed at 3421 Stoney Crest Road in the SW 1/4 SW <br /> 1/4 - Section 13, Town of Dunn. <br /> IN FAVOR: B. Nebel OPPOSED: -- COMMUNICATION: J. Zumstein, <br /> P. Nelson, Town Board <br /> GASRILL/DREPS to grant with condition variance of 5. 6 feet from <br /> required left sideyard to permit screen porch as constructed. <br /> CONDITION: <br /> 1) . That addition remain screen porch and not be permanently <br /> enclosed or sided. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Structure further from side lot line than is building wall of <br /> residence. <br /> 2) . Property is in an area of numerous non-conforming structures <br /> with variances granted. <br /> 3) . Applicant used erronous survey which showed more sideyard than <br /> actually existed. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible <br /> without injustice to applicant. <br /> 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #2571. Appeal by Thompson & Diana Webb for a variance from <br /> required sideyard as provided by Section 10. 07 (7) to permit <br /> proposed residential addition at 4878 Borcher's Beach Road being <br /> Lot #1, and part Lot #2 , Block 2 , Morris Park - Section 33 , Town of <br /> Westport. <br /> IN FAVOR: T. Webb OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board. <br /> RLOPP/GASRILL to deny requested variance from left sideyard to <br /> allow garage addition as proposed. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Proposal is to raze existing garage and construct new enlarged <br /> structure. <br /> 2) . Expansion is intended to incorporate home office. <br /> 3) . Garage expansion would extend structure along side neighbor's <br /> garage and only allow 2± feet passage between buildings. <br /> 4) . Apepars to be alternate locations for in home office. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried - 3-1. <br /> (Dreps, no) . <br /> L <br />