Laserfiche WebLink
(11, BOA 6/23/94 Minutes <br /> Page 4 <br /> CONDITIONS: <br /> 1. That plans and specifications be prepared by a licensed <br /> engineer within the scope of the application, and filed with the <br /> Zoning Department before commencement of any work. <br /> 2 . That all work be performed in compliance with approved <br /> engineering standards and all applicable governmental rules and <br /> regulations particularly Sec. 11. 05 (4) of DCO. <br /> 3. That there be filed with the Zoning Department a certificate of <br /> compliance by a licensed engineer at the completion of the project. <br /> 4. Completion and certification deadline of September 1, 1994 . <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Project in conjunction with 16 ' X 24 ' boathouse construction. <br /> 2 . Applicant has all other necessary governmental agency <br /> approvals. <br /> 3 . Engineering provided by Terry Richard P.E. <br /> 4 . Project should stabilize shoreline and save trees from being <br /> under mined. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1. The project as planned with specified conditions will not <br /> result in substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, <br /> sedimentation, impairment of fish or aquatic life or safe and <br /> healthful conditions. <br /> Cr Motion carried 4-0. <br /> #2529 . Appeal by Jerrold Ebert for a variance from required <br /> setback from road as provided by Section 10. 17 (1) to permit <br /> addition to existing residence at 259 Kasper Road - in the NW 1/4 <br /> NW 1/4 - Section 12 , Town of York. <br /> IN FAVOR: S. Ebert OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board <br /> Klopp/Dreps to grant with condition variance of 29 feet from <br /> required setback to centerline of STH 89 to permit addition and <br /> alteration of existing residence. The addition shall be removed at <br /> the owner' s expense if future road improvement requires additional <br /> right-of-way. <br /> FIND OF FACT: <br /> 1. Proposed addition/alteration will not extend as near to <br /> required setback as does existing residence. <br /> 2. Existing residence is almost entirely within required highway <br /> setback area. <br /> 3 . Addition is to be roofed deck/entry and roof alteration. <br /> 4 . Property is a corner lot with no access on STH 89. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1. Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible <br /> without injustice to applicant. <br /> 2 . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried 4-0. <br />