1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA/Minutes/4/28/94 Page 6 2) . That all work be performed in compliance with approved engineering standards and all applicable governmental rules and regulations particularly Section 11. 05 (4) of Dane County Zoning Ordinance. 3) . That there be filed with the Zoning Department a certified of compliance by a licensed engineer at the completion of the project. 4) . Inspection and approval by Zoning Department upon completion of project. 5) . Completion and certification deadline of July 1, 1994 . FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Project is on-going dock wall replacement and shoreline stabilization. 2) . Department of Natural Pemrit has been issued. 3) . Previous Special Exception Permit #2431 granted - 8/26/93 . 4) . Engineering by Cliff Lawson P. E. CONCLUSION: 1) . •t The project as planned, with specified conditions; will not result in substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, sedimentation, impairment of fish or aquatic life, or safe and healthful conditions. Motion carried - 3-0. #2506. Appeal by Gary & Karen Shmerler for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10. 17 (2) to permit accessory building as proposed at 2292 CTH AB being Lot #7 , Block #1, Colladay Park - Section 23 , Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: K. Schmerler OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board GASKILL/KLOPP to grant, with condition, variance of 41 feet from required setback to right-of-way of CTH AB to permit storage shed relocation. CONDITION: 1) . The structure shall be removed at the owner ' s expense if future road improvement requires additional right-of-way. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Structure to be relocated out of highway right-of-way. 2) . Property slopes sharply downhill as it leaves the highway. 3) . Structure shall be located not nearer than 1 foot from right- of-way line and overhang not into right-of-way. 4) . Structure needed for storage of yard items and personal goods. CONCLUSION: 1) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 2) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. Motion carried - 3-0.