1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE HELD ON September 26, 1991 The following members were present: Harvey, Edgar, Clark-Gaskill, Quackenbush and Rendall. Also: Fleck and Reynolds. Meeting called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Harvey in Room #2-E City-County Building to hold public hearing as published by Class II Notice. Quackenbush/Clark-Gaskill Minutes of August 22 and September 24, 1991. Motion carried - 4-0. #2167. Appeal by Scott Sign Company, agent for Meier GMC Truck Inc. for a variance from required maximum sign area, height and number of signs allowed as provided by Section 10.74(19) to permit on-premise pylon sign at 200 West Beltline Highway in the SW 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 36, Town of Madison. IN FAVOR: M. Anderson OPPOSED: -- COMMUNICATION: Town Board Quackenbush/Edgar to hold until October Hearing to allow applicant to investigate possibility of incorporating 2 pylon signs into 1 sign. Motion carried - 5-0. #2168. Appeal by Vivian Engineering, agent for Robert Seamon for a Special Exception Permit as provided by Section 11.05(3) to permit filling, grading, etc., within 300 feet of Lake Koshkonong at 346 Lake Park Shore Drive being part of Lots 5, 7 and all of Lot #6, Block 1, Edgerton Beach - Section 25, Town of Albion. IN FAVOR: F. Vivian OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Planning Commission Quackenbush/Clark-Gaskill to hold until October Hearing to allow Board to make inspection of property. Motion carried - 5-0. #2169. Appeal by Pietsch Landscaping for a variance from required setback from. road as provided by Section 10.17(1) to permit addition to existing garden center at 2727 USH 51 in the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 - Section 9, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: J. Frankin OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board Quackenbush/Clark-Gaskill to grant variance of 19 more or less feet from required setback to centerline of USH 51 to permit addition to existing garden center. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Application is a re-apply of previous grant to which permit was not obtained. 2). Proposed addition will extend no nearer to right-of-way than does existing garden center. 3). property has other variances for buildings as constructed. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. kimw Motion carried - 5-0.