1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA 9/26/91 MINUTES Page 2 L. #2170. Appeal by Robert Vejvoda for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17(3)(b) to permit addition to existing residence at 2100 Barber Drive in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 26, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: R &J Vejoda OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board Clark-Gaskill/Quackenbush to hold until October Hearing pending review of possibility of need for rezone to multi-family district. Motion carried - 5-0. #2171. Appeal by Tom E. Price, agent for Raymond Miller for a variance from required setback from normal high watermark as provided by Section 11.03(2) to permit construction of new single family residence at 2079 Skyline Drive being part of NE NW, Section 29, Town of Pleasant Springs. IN FAVOR: T. Price, R. Miller OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board Edgar/Rendall to hold until October Hearing pending applicant investigating alternative design which would remove need for variance. Motion carried - 5-0. #2172. Appeal by Randy and Jane Kjellstrom for a variance from required setback from normal high watermark and number of residences/parcel as provided by Sections 10.04(1) and 11.03(2) to permit converting existing residence to guest cottage and construct new single family residence at 1964 A Quam Point Drive being Lot #6, Addition to Ole J. Quam's Park - Section 25, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: R & J Kjellstrom OPPOSED: J. Knickmeyer, R. Ely COMMUNICATION: Town Board. Edgar/Clark-Gaskill to hold in abeyance not beyond December Hearing to allow applicant to investigate alternatives. \"I IL/ j hi) Motion carried - 5-0. C Yv ti "�"�` r 4v., ►. I y r l #2173. Appeal by Charles & Betty Hull for a variance from required sideyard as provided by Section 10.16(5) to permit construction of single family residence at 3330 Quam Drive being part of Lot #21, Ole J. Quam's Park - Section 25, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: C & B Hull OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board. Rendall/Quackenbush to grant variance of 0.5 feet, to both right and left, required sideyards to permit construction of new single family residence on existing residential lot. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Lot is legally buildable at only 33 feet in width. 2). 24 foot is standard construction dimension. 3). Property is in an area of numerous nonconforming structure with several sideyard variances granted. 4). Proposed structure will incorporate attached garage and be without basement. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. C