Laserfiche WebLink
BOA/MINUTES/10/28/93 <br /> Page 5 <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1. Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible <br /> without injustice to applicant. <br /> 2 . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Motion carried 4-0. <br /> #2450. Appeal by Convenience Store Investments, Inc. for a <br /> variance from required sign height, areas and location as <br /> provided by Sections 10. 74 (5) and 10. 78 (9) to permit on- <br /> premise ground sign at 6325 Martin Drive being Lot #1, <br /> Highway 19 Commercial Plat - Section 5, Town of Burke. <br /> IN FAVOR: P. Hansen OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: --- <br /> * Applicant withdraws request to locate sign within vision <br /> triangle. <br /> Dreps/Lynch to grant variance of 12 . 8 square feet or the maximum of <br /> 20% allowable for sign area increase to allow gas pricing sign. <br /> Motion failed 1-3 (Lynch, Klopp and Gaskill - No) . <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1. Applicant claims larger sign needed to aid motoring public. <br /> 2 . Sign visibility needed to improve highway safety. <br /> 3 . Signage pre-dating current sign ordinance considered "Non- <br /> Conforming" . <br /> 4 . Property is vacant lot and all new construction must comply. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1. Unnecessary hardship was not proven. <br /> #2451. Appeal by Robert and Nancy Chritton for a variance from <br /> required setback from road as provided by Sections <br /> 10. 16 (4) and 10. 17 (3) to permit addition to existing <br /> residence at 3146 Shadyside Drive being Part of Lot #10, <br /> Vea Park - Section 30, Town of Pleasant Springs. <br /> IN FAVOR: R. Chritton OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board and <br /> adjoining neighbors. <br /> Lynch/Klopp to grant variance of 21. 25 feet, plus or minus, from <br /> required setback to centerline of right-of-way of Shadyside Drive <br /> to permit garage addition to existing residence to be 17 feet from <br /> right-of-way line. <br /> FIND OF FACT: <br /> 1. Proposed addition will replace detached garage which <br /> encroaches into road right-of-way. <br /> 2 . Garage and other proposed additions will meet all other <br /> location requirements. <br /> 3 . Road classification confusing due to varying right-of-way <br /> widths and township acquisitions. <br /> 4 . Similar variances granted in the area and many non-conforming <br /> structures exist. <br />