1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA 4/22/92 Minutes Page 5 4). Garage is its present location is approximately 50 years old. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. 2). Variance is not conrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried - 4-0. Klopp, obstain. #2377. Appeal by Badger Display Signs, agent for Hyundai Alfa-Romeo of Madison for a variance from required maximum height of wall mounted sign as provided by Section 10.75(8) to permit wall sign as proposed at 320 W. Beltline Highway in the SW 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 36, Town of Madison. IN FAVOR: J. Miller , T. Zimbrick OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: ---. Gaskill/Lynch to grant variance of 2 feet or less from required maximum height of wall mounted sign to permit installation of new signage. FINDING OF FACT: 1). New signage will replace sign of similar height which pre-dated present sign ordinance. 2). Fascia of existing building severely limits locating signage at complying height. 3). Height Variance similar to previous approval #2297 (9/24/92) to which adjoining highway (not frontage) speeds are considered. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 2). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. Motion carried - 3-0. (Quackenbush and Klopp, abstain) . #2378. Appeal by Kenneth Wulf, agent for Susan Cooper for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17(2) to permit additions to existing residence as proposed at 1785 CTH V in the NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 12, Town of Bristol. IN FAVOR: K. Wulf OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: County Highway Gaskill/Lynch to grant variance 39 more or less feet from minimum required setback to centerline of CTH V to permit 2nd story addition also 1 story addition to rear of existing residence. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Second story addition will extend no further into required setback than does existing structure. 2). As per 10.23(4) if more than 50% of the existing structure has to be removed or replaced this approval is invalid. 3). Property is in an area of many nonconforming structures and several with similar variances. 4). Dane County Highway Department has objected. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2). Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. Motion carried - 4-0. (Klopp, abstain). #2379. Appeal by Jeff Gottsacker for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17(2) to permit accessory building as proposed at 3703 CTH M in the NW 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 27, Town of Middleton. IN FAVOR: J. Gottsacker OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: County Highway. Gaskill/Dreps to hold appeal in abeyance until May Hearing to allow applicant to research alternative locations. Motion carried - 3-0.