Laserfiche WebLink
BOA MINUTES 3/28/96 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 3) . Present owner purchased property without knowledge of <br /> violation. <br /> 4) . Dunn Place setback Variance never utilized and present <br /> owner wishes abeyance until April Hearing to consider. <br /> 5) . Property is in an area Of numerous non-conforming <br /> structures and many with Variances granted. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the <br /> public interest. <br /> 2) . Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as <br /> possible without injustice to applicant. <br /> #2718 . Appeal by Randy W. Severson for variance from <br /> required lot area, setback from road, and rearyard as <br /> provided by Sections 10. 07 (4) , (6) , and (8) and 10 . 17 (2) to <br /> permit additions and lot division for existing and proposed <br /> residences at 8631 CTH S (West Mineral Point Road) in the NE <br /> 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 27, Town of Cross Plains. <br /> IN FAVOR: R. Severson OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: <br /> County Highway, Environmental Health <br /> SAYLES/KLOPP to grant variance of 20 feet from required <br /> rearyard (Rezone #6552 - 4/9/96 P.H. ) for existing garage as <br /> located. Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> SAYLES/KLOPP to grant Variance, with condition, of 18 .7 feet <br /> (r, from required setback to right-of-way CTH S to permit deck <br /> as constructed. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> CONDITION: <br /> 1) . The deck addition shall be removed at the owner' s <br /> expense if future road improvement requires additional <br /> right-of-way. <br /> SAYLES/GASKILL to deny requested Variance from minimum <br /> required lot area to permit lot division as proposed. <br /> Motion carried. 4-0. <br /> SAYLES/GASKILL to hold in abeyance, not beyond May 196 <br /> Hearing, requested Variance from required setback from <br /> right-of-way CTH S to permit residential construction as <br /> proposed. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . applicant has 462 feet x 87 feet lot (40, 194 square <br /> feet) with existing residence and proposes to divide and <br /> construct new home. <br /> 2) . Deck addition, in setback violation, was built without <br /> required permits. <br /> 3) . Lot division as proposed is in conflict with septic <br /> system for existing residence, as per Dane County <br /> Environmental Health. <br /> 4) . County Highway Department prefers any new construction <br /> meet required setbacks due to possibility of future right- <br /> (' expansion. <br />