2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA MINUTES 12/19/02 PAGE 3 #3223. Appeal by The Town of Dunn on behalf of numerous property owners for variances from required lot areas and widths as provided by Section 11.03(1) and 10.05(4) to bring existing lots into compliance after road vacations at 1924 through 1946 Barber Drive being Lots #20 through#31 Rock Elm Park Extension, Lots #20A through #31A Addition to Rock Elm Park Extension and adjacent lands in the NW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 26 Town of Dunn; also at 2860 Lakeside Street being Lot 6, Block 1 Waubesa Beach 1st Addition and adjacent lands in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 8, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: R. Gausman OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board, Historical Society KAY/ROSS to grant variances from minimum required lot areas and lot widths to permit vacated roads to be added to existing parcels as proposed. Finding of fact: 1). Town of Dunn has vacated portions of 2 roads, Kegonsa Boulevard and Center Avenue. 2). The means of adding lands to lots in a recorded plat is by CSM or replat. 3). Center Avenue was platted in 1909 and Kegonsa Boulevard was platted in 1905. 4). Section 10.07(4) (R-3 Residence District)Dane County Code of Ordinance requires minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet and 100 foot minimum lot width. fr Conclusion: 1). Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried—5-0. #3224. Appeal by Fred & Candace Groth for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17(2) to permit new single family residence construction Southeast of 2306 County Highway AB being Lot#2, CSM #8309 in the SE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 23, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: F & C Groth, R. Gausman OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board SAYLES/ROSS to grant with condition a variance of 8.33 feet from minimum required setback to right-of-way of County Highway AB to permit residence construction as proposed. Conditions: That garage floor elevation not exceed 903.75 feet mean sea level, as agreed upon by applicant and township. Also, that structure maintain the 75 foot required setback from normal high watermark. Finding of fact: 1). Applicant proposes to build at the 75 foot setback from normal high watermark due to severe slope rather than at the minimum required average setback of 69 feet.