Laserfiche WebLink
BOA MINUTES 7/26/01 <br /> PAGE 4 <br /> 3). Recent airport runway lengthening has actually lowered maximum airport height <br /> (ro limit 13.2 feet since similar 1990 addition. <br /> 4). Proposed addition is to be below original main building by 23.4 feet. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> 2). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to <br /> applicant. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> #3145. Appeal by Helen G. Randecker for a variance from required setback from normal <br /> high watermark, road, and sideyards as provided by Sections 11.03, 10.17(4) and <br /> 10.07(6) to permit additions to existing residence at 3066 Shadyside Drive being Lot#7 <br /> Shadyside Park and adjacent land in the SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 30, Town of Pleasant <br /> Springs. <br /> IN FAVOR: T & C Kowlowski OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: DNR, <br /> Town Board. <br /> *Applicant withdraws right sideyard variance request for garage addition. <br /> LONG/KAY to deny setback from normal high watermark to allow proposed additions <br /> to encroach toward Lake Kegonsa. Motion carried- 5-0. <br /> KAY/SAYLES to grant variances of 5 feet± from both right and left sideyard to permit <br /> second story addition over existing footprint. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> P ROSS/SAYLES to grant a variance of 8± feet from required setback, to original platted <br /> road of Lake Shore Drive, to allow residence garage addition to extend 42 feet from rear <br /> wall of existing residence. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> Finding of fact: <br /> 1). Property has road right of way (Lake Shore Drive) of 20 feet bisecting it which <br /> appears not to have been vacated. <br /> 2). Applicant proposes second story and garage addition to existing single story <br /> residence. <br /> 3). Property is 66' x 23' lot, located on the shore of Lake Kegonsa, in the Plat of <br /> Shadyside Park. <br /> 4). Proposed encroachment to normal high watermark is for deck and balconies. <br /> 5). Applicant has offered to alter proposed plan to locate garage in conforming location. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> 2). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to <br /> applicant. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> APPEALS FROM PREVIOUS HEARINGS: <br /> #3130 -Devine - Cottage Grove - 5/24/01 Public Hearing. <br /> *No appearances. <br /> C <br />