Laserfiche WebLink
BOA MINUTES 6/28/2001 <br /> PAGE 5 <br /> tor <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to <br /> applicant. <br /> 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried- 5-0. <br /> #3134. Appeal by the Town Board of Montrose of the interpretation of the Dane County <br /> Zoning Administrator as it pertains to the permit tolling and the one-year Conditional Use <br /> Permit implementation deadline, as provided by Sections 10.255(2)(L) & 10.26(4)Dane <br /> County Code of Ordinances while under appeal to the Dane County Board. <br /> Board member Sayles recuses himself from the proceedings, as he is an official of the <br /> Town of Montrose. <br /> IN OPPOSITION TO THE Z.A'S. INTERPRETATION: L. Dulski, P. Noeldner, C. <br /> Anderson,P. Kienitz,R. Hodel,B. Wolberg,D. Brucaya, P. Johnson, D. Blecker, C. <br /> McKenzie, J. Cooley. <br /> IN SUPPORT OF THE Z.A'S INTERPRETATION: E. Alschuler, L. Billups. <br /> Klopp/Long to hold requested appeal of the Zoning Administrators interpretation in <br /> abeyance until the July hearing,to allow the Board to review materials submitted at this <br /> hearing. Furthermore, any additional submittals are to be delivered to the zoning staff on <br /> or before July 17, 01. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> Ross/Kay to adjourn. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> Meeting adjourned at 11:20 P.M. <br /> Steven H. Reynolds, <br /> Recording secretary <br /> &COU/ypy <br /> R892ta <br /> CLERK. <br />